Mike, Sorry for the confusion. The generic paginated views will not work correctly because SQL Server 2000 doesn't naively support the limit offset functionality that other DBs do. I think that SQL Server 2005 does have that functionality, but so many people still use SQL Server 2000 that a solution that accommodates both has to be created.
Thanks, Sean On 3/1/07, Mike H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 3/1/2007, "Sean De La Torre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >With the exception of dataset paging, it is feature complete and stable. > > Excuse the dumb question, but does that mean that generic paginated views > will not work, or will just be quite inefficient? > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > > >On 3/1/07, Jeremy Dunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 3/1/07, Fuzzkat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > Our Django app - currently running against version 0.96pre - has a > >> > business requirement to support Microsoft SQL Server or Oracle. > >> > >> There is a branch for Oracle support. After some discussion at PyCon, > >> it seems there is a plan for getting it merged back to trunk. I'm not > >> sure when that'll be, but more testers on that branch would help move > >> it along. In any case, I seriously doubt it'd happen before 0.96. > >> > >> > >> > http://code.djangoproject.com/browser/django/branches/boulder-oracle-sprint > >> > >> > We're on the verge of defecting to Ruby-on-Rails, with it's out of > the > >> > box MS-SQL support, as the only SQL Server patch that we have found > >> > only works against 0.91. > >> > >> I don't think MS SQL support will happen without a champion (as > >> occurred with Oracle). I and several others had a go at it about a > >> year ago and there has been a good bit of interest in it, but not > >> enough to actually get it working and get a commitment to maintain the > >> support going forward. > >> > >> There's some hope that Malcolm's effort to refactor QuerySet will help > >> bring in SQL Server, but it will be well after 0.96 in any case. > >> > >> > Has anyone written a working patch against 0.95 or 0.96pre that can > >> > save our project? > >> > >> Sorry. :-/ > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
