Actually, it looks like Atom1Feed is where the restriction is. Anyone have a replacement for Atom1Feed that does full-content?
Otherwise, I'll write one and contribute it (I'm working on Django support for the Atom Publishing Protocol, anyway) James On 03/02/2007, at 2:39 PM, James Tauber wrote: > > But the description template seems to just control the content of the > summary element in Atom. > > If I want a full content feed, rather than just a summary, it looks > like I can't use django.contrib.syndication.views.feed > > > On 03/02/2007, at 4:47 AM, aaloy wrote: >> 2007/2/3, James Tauber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> However, I'd like my feed to be full content. Given what I have >>> below, what's the most straightforward way to make my feed full >>> content? >> The full content would depend on your template. That is, you can make >> your template to present full content, just a summary, etc. Its >> just a >> matter to work with the template and present what you want. >> >>> I'm assuming I'm going to have to write a template for full-content >>> Atom entries, but I'm not sure how to get >>> django.contrib.syndication.views.feed to work with that. Currently, >>> django.contrib.syndication.views.feed just uses a feedgenerator, >>> right. Not a template? >> No. In fact it can use a template if you define it as >> <your_feed>_description.html. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
