On 12/18/06, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At one point, I thought about using Dojo for some improvements in Django's > admin interface; this would have meant such an inclusion. To make a long > story short... it didn't really work :)
Yeah, and my short-lived attempt to port our existing JS over to Dojo-style packages didn't exactly work either. > Even if it had happened, however, it wouldn't really have changed anything > about you'd *use* Django; I'm not really sure what "including" Dojo would gain > you over downloading it separately (besides saving a minute or two). And in the case of Dojo, I'm not even sure that bundling it is a useful option for any framework; honestly, I'd rather get it off a CDN and take advantage of the cross-domain goodness. -- "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- George Carlin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
