[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But here's a question... why are you trying to put this object into a
> string? Seems like you'd be better off just keeping it an object.
> Perhaps you'd be better off with a simple
> test = document.getElementById('id_embeddedvideo.0.type'); or, if you
> needed to do something with it, maybe something like
> test.cloneNode(true)
>
> Just a thought. It seems to me that at BEST, trying to put it into a
> string is going to be fragile.
>
>
>
The idea is to spit out more fields dynamically (I just increment the
.0. part each time). It worked great for other stuff. Example:
var next_file_no = 1;
function getFileField(){
var orig = '<p><label>Description</label>{{
form.fileattachment.0.description }}<label>File</label>{{
form.fileattachment.0.image }}{{ form.fileattachment.0.image_file }}</p>';
var filefields = document.getElementById('filefields');
orig = orig.replace(/\.0\./g,'.' + next_file_no + '.');
next_file_no += 1;
filefields.innerHTML += orig;
}
Your idea is a little more work but I think I'll attempt that rather
than creating a filter.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
