I'd be grateful for some advice on efficiently combining lighttpd, fastcgi and django. I have this working after working through the suggestions on the django site, but am unsure whether the result is actually very efficient, nor how to optimise. All three (and mysql) are running on the same box (I'm not expecting more than 30 clients accessing my site, and not mor than 2-3 simultaneous requests, and the data processing is not heavy/slow). I start django with something like: ./manage.py runfcgi host=127.0.0.1 port=xxx method=prefork pidfile=xxx and see 5 (the default) fastcgi processes are running. The relevant bit of lightppd.conf is: fastcgi.server = ( "/mysite.fcgi" => ( "main" => ( "host" => "127.0.0.1", "port" => xxx, "check-local" => "disable", ) ),) My questions are: 1) Will the 5 fascgi processes actually be used? As set up all lighttpd request are going to the same port, and all the fastcgi processes are listening on the same port. So which will do the work? I'm not sure having more than 2 fascgi processes makes sense with only 2 cpus and all clients coming over the same fastish network link? Does lighttpd's 'load balancing' capability even get invoked with everythin going through the same port? 2) Also, is this load 'obviously' reasonable on a 2 processor 1.4Ghz AIX 5.3 system- I appreciate time will tell Many thanks,
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
