Re: How about a Django apps public repository?

Mon, 11 Sep 2006 06:07:19 -0700

I think Djangoforge should have the ability to host projects as follows:

1. Full projects
2. Useful Classes
3. Useful Functions -

similar to a mini hotscripts, sometimes someone has written a great project/application but no one has the time to trall through to look for particular featureful classes/functions, and it would be great to have the ability to list these seperately when one feels they have had a stroke of genius and have written a class/function they feel is simply amazing.

Also can we have a forum rather than mailing lists, they are anoying and not the easiest to store knowledge on problems/resolutions

regards

charles.

----- Original Message ----
From: Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: django-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:26:25 PM
Subject: Re: How about a Django apps public repository?


Oh, I was going for .ORG! Luckylly I read the list before going for it ;)

If you, or another volunteer can setup a system (debian etch
preferred) I can go on configuring the mailling lists, the TRAC
hosting, SVN repositories and so on (and some scripts to manage them).
It would be better to use a VPS on its own for security.

So, if anybody has a spare debian etch VPS around there ... ;)) Then
we can get what Ian is working on and tie everything toghether. I'll
be on IRC during the afternoon (telenieko)

Cheers,
Marc.

On 9/11/06, Sean Schertell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay then, let's do it :-)
>
> I can get started in October putting this together. I have servers,
> bandwidth, and general webdev skills. I've registered djangoforge.net
> for us to use, and I can commit to maintaining the site.
>
> Any other volunteers for helping to develop the system? Any other
> apps contributions?
>
> Also, more thoughts on how you'd like to see this implemented would
> be much appreciated. How would you like this site to work? What
> features do we need at a minimum?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> On Sep 9, 2006, at 12:33 PM, Jeff Forcier wrote:
>
> >
> > Sean Schertell wrote:
> >>
> >> Any other contributors?
> >
> > I've got a handful of templatetags, which while somewhat outdated
> > (built against ~0.91) should still be useful. I also have a (very)
> > small forums app which I plan on expanding when I find the time,
> > although it would need some cleanup to use outside of the site it's
> > currently in.
> >
> > There are a couple of other things I've written up but one of them
> > sucks and the other one is really just documentation which should
> > go in
> > a blog post or on the Django wiki.
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> ::::  DataFly.Net  ::::
> Complete Web Services
> http://www.datafly.net
>
>
> >
>


--
The probability of failure of a (computer) system is exponentially
proportional to the physical distance between it and the one who could
fix it. -- Martin F. Krafft


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to