On Monday, June 4, 2012, vivek wrote: > Hi, > > > To load test I used loadimpact.com and the results of which can be > found on: > http://loadimpact.com/load-test/www.reviews42.com-18774e46e8f562a6eb4... > > The test configuration consisted of 600 VUs with 10 mins step duration. > > Got around .1 millions requests and around 200+ requests/sec max. Is this > > good, bad, or at par? > > Some quick observations from results: > 1. The user load times start from 30+ seconds
That's aggregated load time, and not a single page loading time. The test comprised of navigating to multiple pages to generate more real life scenario. > 2. The error rate also increases with higher requests/sec. Yes. With high reqs/sec it's starts to come in. An upcoming major client side code optimization is in pipeline. A drastic change in reqs/sec is expected. > 3. text/html , which is the output of django app, is taking 62.74 % > time. This number might not be bad actually, taking into consideration that I aim to reduce the number of http connections per page to something pretty low. > Overall things don't seem optimal. If you are testing based on load > times of 30+ sec then the test approach may not be practical, you dont > expect your visitor to wait 30+ sec. Your application itself may need > more fine tuning. text/html generation time seem on higher side. > Also be mindful that generally database performance on Amazon EC2 is > lower compared to bare metal servers but you have mentioned that the > queries are minimal so not sure how much would that have any impact. > As I said above the 30+ secs is the aggregated number. That too for un-optimized browser code. > > What is the payload of your html page ? > 5- 10 Kb (compressed) on avg depending upon page content > > Without knowing much about the application its usually difficult to > say much but based on the results, there seems to be scope of > improvement in html generation itself. > Once the major client side optimization comes through, and some deployment/setup changes, I expect the request/sec handling capability to easily shoot the sky. Since you thought the aggregated load time to be of a single page, I guess your perspectives need to change accordingly. :) > > rgds > vivek > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
