On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Stuart Laughlin <stu...@bistrotech.net> > wrote: >> I also note that everyone who advocates >> for apache concedes that the default installation/configuration is really >> not appropriate for django apps. I intend to look more deeply into the >> suitability of the default configurations of nginx / lighttpd / cherokee as >> delivered by various linux distros. Finally, your point about mod_wsgi's >> superior configurability is a good one, and something I had not considered. > > You're inventing words that you think I said. The 'default' config is > entirely appropriate for django apps, it is however not high > performance. > > I say 'default', because it is only the default on certain OS. On the > platform we serve on, FreeBSD, it is a simple choice which MPM to > choose, and the default configuration for Apache configured with > worker or event MPM is entirely on par with nginx/lighty. >
Fair enough, Tom. "The default config of apache on certain operating systems (e.g. most linux distros) will not yield high performance for your django apps." I suspect it was my unqualified usage of the nebulous phrase "not appropriate" that prompted you to accuse me of "inventing words that [I] think [you] said," but in fact the more clearly stated proposition above is what I had in mind in the first place. Regards, --Stuart -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
