I've run django on Windows Server with apache and it was easy to deploy. Forget IIS. I've deployed Nginx and uWSGI on linux and that was even easier. I've never done Nginx on windows, but I don't think it would be a big deal.
On Jul 26, 1:25 pm, Dimitry Zolotaryov <dimi...@webit.ca> wrote: > So if I run into performance issues, I can always pipe from Apache to > something like gunicorn and keep Apache serving static media? > > Dimitry > > On 26 juil, 13:03, Javier Guerra Giraldez <jav...@guerrag.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Dimitry Zolotaryov <dimi...@webit.ca> > > wrote: > > > Knowing this, any advice on the original question would be greatly > > > appreciated. > > > I haven't done any deployment on windows; but i do know some helpful facts: > > > - microsoft invests a lot of money in making sure that high-profile > > OSS projects do run and run well on windows. That definitely includes > > Apache, Python, and MySQL at least. don't know if PostgreSQL enjoys > > this treatment (might erode into MS-SQL server mindshare?) > > > - nginx and mod_wsgi can be compiled, and kinda run; but with severe > > limitations. mod_wsgi in particular can't run in daemon mode. > > > - any pure-Python setting should run without surprises, that lets you > > choose either gunicorn or flup (for FastCGI) behind Apache. contrary > > to some comments, a well-supervised flup setup can perform just as > > good as the cool guys; but if you're not familiar with it gunicorn > > might be easier. again, it's more a question of familiarity than of > > performance. > > > good luck! > > > -- > > Javier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
