On 12 Jul 2011 08:13, "bruno desthuilliers" <bruno.desthuilli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 12, 3:37 am, Venkatraman S <venka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On the validation, yes, it is a little pesky. But, offlate, i am trying to > > *understand* it better and trying to move the logic > > to the client. For eg. jquery-validate does bulk of the stuff on client side > > - atleast for required fields. So, moving > > bulk of the validation to the client helps in avoiding a few http calls. > > Client-side validation may be fine from a UX POV, but you just CAN NOT > rely on it - I mean, unless you're happy with unvalidated user > inputs....
+1 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
