Here is what I've come up with so far: https://github.com/foxx/jennifer/wiki/Design-Sketch
I've enabled public edit mode, so feel free to add/change. Cal On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote: > Also, one of the things you mentioned (about security updates of the chroot) > is something i have been pondering today. Although a single compile will > mean recompile everytime a security announce is released, this is > unavoidable. > > This is my idea for handling security announcements: > > The single binary will have support for monitoring various sources for > indications as to whether or not there is a security announcement for one or > more of its internal componants. Within the configuration, the user can set > an email address which these alerts are sent to. To avoid any single person > being the weak link, we'll make it monitor not only the official project > announce, but also remote security repos, to give it hints as to whether or > not there is a security release for any specific component. > > The above idea will need some tweaking ofc, or maybe someone else could > think of a better way to do this..? > > This also makes me think about build control. I guess each project would end > up having a build file for future rebuilds, would it be wise to integrate > this into the binary, as a backup incase the original is lost?? > > So many thoughts.. > > Cal > > On 8 Jul 2011 10:47, "Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd]" > <cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote: >> Hi Bjarni, >> >> Thanks for your input. As pointed out earlier in the thread, the end goal >> is >> to provide a single binary that is entirely host independant, contains the >> chroot/stack needed by the webapp etc. >> >> You really need to watch the facebook video link i included earlier in the >> thread to understand what we're trying to achieve. >> >> Im drawing up the design principles today, which should give you a better >> idea.. but in a nutshell, imagine a single binary which would run entirely >> from memory, be completely host independant, contain everything the webapp >> needed (stack/chroot/deps etc), and have a nice ncurses interface to >> configure this all from (with features like automatic memory usage >> calculation / configuration - something which is overlooked oh so many >> times) >> On 8 Jul 2011 08:53, "Bjarni Rúnar Einarsson" <b...@pagekite.net> wrote: > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
