On 8 Lug, 14:44, Thomas Guettler <h...@tbz-pariv.de> wrote: > On 06.07.2011 15:33, drakkan wrote:> On 6 Lug, 14:03, akaariai > <akaar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 5, 10:54 pm, drakkan <drakkan1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... > > > using pgpool I get a 2,5x performance improvement thanks! I'll try on > > intel atom again to see if there I have more improvements > > Hi, > > I am interessted in the result. Please post them to the list.
test from my laptop django+uwsgi+pgpool2: Requests per second: 71.40 [#/sec] (mean) Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 56 66% 64 75% 70 80% 73 90% 81 95% 86 98% 93 99% 98 100% 134 (longest request) without pgpool2: Requests per second: 35.87 [#/sec] (mean) Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 107 66% 119 75% 128 80% 135 90% 154 95% 171 98% 196 99% 213 100% 306 (longest request) play 1.2.2 default options and default template engine (no japid) Requests per second: 186.12 [#/sec] (mean) Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 20 66% 23 75% 26 80% 27 90% 32 95% 35 98% 42 99% 47 100% 68 (longest request) the db is postgres 8.4 I have no time to try jinja2 now, I guess it should speed up django a bit, drakkan > > Thomas > > -- > Thomas Guettler,http://www.thomas-guettler.de/ > E-Mail: guettli (*) thomas-guettler + de -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
