yes nginx+uwsgi seems to be the best combination for django. KM On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Eugene MechanisM < eugene.mechan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I used this for several months, and encountered all kinds of horrible > memory > > allocation problems, crashes, etc etc. > it's can be posiible with any server software if this server is bad > configured. > I'll never use apache or cherokee or lighttpd, coz nginx faster and > better. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
