Hello, you should think of it in terms of ressource, not of file. URLs are about ressources not about files even if sometimes ressources are files.
Django's way to build URLs is flexible. URLs built this way can make much more sense that URLs built upon file path. ie www.yourdomain.com/articles/20101/08/20/your_article_title is way clearer than www.yourdomain.com/article.php?id=15820 Web crawlers collect URLs, I think they don't bother wether URL contains a file path or not (but I'm not a expert on this topic). And the more the URL is clear, the best the ressource is ranked. I've read many times about clear URLs in SEO good practices. On 20 août, 14:02, Karim Gorjux <lemieli...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all! This is my first post here in the list, I'm new in django and > python but I really found it fun and exciting so here we are! > My first question is pretty simple. I noted that the url I create > using urls.py are cleaned and pretty but there is no index.html or > simila. It seems that every url point to a directory. Is that good in > terms of SEO? > > I guess that is even better than the old fashion way with the > index.something, but I don't know. > > Thanks in advance > > -- > Karim Gojuxwww.karimblog.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
