On 7/21/06, Waylan Limberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which just so happens to be a separate application that is not in any > way required to use django. Of course, if you elect to take that > route, you'll have to build your own 'less magical' backend. But if > that makes you feel more comfortable you are given that option. > Nothing scarey there.
While I can see the point you're trying to make, it seems like you're trying to dismiss his point as a technicality rather than address it at a technical level. The admin app is supported by the django devs, ships with django, and is a large component of the tutorials. For all intents and purposes (especially to someone just starting off), it is django. The original poster's problem was with "magic" in django, not just the core framework. FWIW, I don't necessarily agree with him. I just hate seeing concerns being dismissed due to word choice. -- Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
