On 7/27/2010 12:38 PM, Torsten Bronger wrote: > Hallöchen! > > bruno desthuilliers writes: > >> On 27 juil, 07:19, Torsten Bronger <bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> >> wrote: >> >>> Currently, our Django app relies on the stability of various auto >>> ID fields which are implicitly generated by Django/database >>> backend. >> >> [...] From a practical POV, starting from a mint empty DB and >> inserting records in the same order without any other client app >> accessing to the DB, you should probably get the same IDs, but >> there's absolutely no garantee. > > At least, they are explicitly mentioned in a "manage.py dumpdata" > fixture, and probably in a SQL dump, too. But the DB may ignore > autofields when loading that data, right? > It couldn't do that without ruining the relationships, could it? A dump includes the numerical values for the foreign keys, so the related primary keys have to stay the same to maintain relational integrity.
regards Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.