On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Torsten Bronger <bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > But I think that it's not too expensive if by default Django stored > both the PK and the actual model name in the parent table. > Additionally, find_actual_instance should be built-in based on this > additional column. > > After all, I've read about this problem for the forth time on this > list (and I don't read it regularly), plus a private email > conversion with someone who found old postings of me on Google > Groups. > > Tschö, > Torsten. >
+1 In fact it wouldn't be too tricky to auto add those fields. A project for the weekend, I think. Cheers Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
