On 6/10/06, Ned Batchelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am still using 0.91, and have a question about this Model Inheritance > issue in the current trunk. We use model inheritance in our code, but in a > specialized way: only the derived classes are used concretely. The base > classes are all abstract: there are no rows in their tables, no objects are > ever instantiated, and no queries are made for the base classes. We do this > to build common sets of fields that are available on a number of different > objects, which can then be used polymorphically with Python duck-typing. > > Is this style of model inheritance still possible on the current trunk? > > --Ned. >
I was using this style of subclassing as well before I migrated to the latest trunk. I found it extremely valuable and I would like to see the trunk capable of it again. matthew --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
