On 4/14/06, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think your next release should be an alpha based on magic-removal not > an upgrade of .92. Cut your losses.
There has been some commits to the trunk and given how some hosting parties will not install non-released versions I think it might be fair for those people depending on that to release a 0.92 or something like that prior to cut everything in MR over to trunk. > Fwiw, as a bystander, magic-removal > has been too long on the branch and looking at the commit history it > seems to be your true development trunk (ie there's a lot more than > magic removal going on). It needs to get merged back or killed. Branches are indeed meant for testing and such without disrupting the main development line. But given how the main development line will be the MR code it needs to be moved back to trunk. > Simulataneous releases will confuse people and enhance any perception > that Django is unstable not ready for production work. Parallel branch > management has really hurt the Zope community for example; there are > lots of other examples out there. I have to agree to that sentiment too though. The less confusion the better. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
