James Bennett wrote: > On 3/12/06, MarC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Is "svn co http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk/"; close enough to >>the final 1.0 version >>and safe/stable enough? > > > It's safe enough for use, but the next version, 0.92, is going to make > a huge number of backwards-incompatible changes. My advice would be to > do one of two things: > > 1) Grab an SVN checkout from trunk and use it to learn how the various > parts of Django work together, knowing that some things (most notably > the database API) will be changing soon, or > > 2) Grab an SVN checkout from the "magic-removal" branch, which is > stabilizing and will become, or be merged into trunk immediately > preceding, the Django 0.92 release, and learn your way around the new > ways of doing things. Changes from how things work in trunk are > detailed here: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/RemovingTheMagic
The database API is important for me. I decided not to start coding with smth I haven't developped and I have never used which is neither documented nor totally bug-free yet. (those old debian times have gone a long time ago and now I'm running ubuntu stable :). I think I will spend some more time prototyping the app and doing a first draft with current 0.91, to see if its worth taking a risk with pre-1.0-django and I will compare it with other existing alternatives. Thank you for your comments. Looking forward to see 0.92 in a few weeks! MarC --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
