On 2/28/06, kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The only problem with pymssql from my POV is that it is GPL; adodbapi > is LGPL which is more liberal and closer to Django's license. I looked > at ticket 1258, it looks like much of that work would apply to adodbapi > as well. Certainly some of the failing adodbapi tests would be fixed by > the same changes. Would you be interested in having two working > adapters if I can get adodbapi to work?
Kent, sorry for not getting back to you sooner -- I meant to first thing this morning. Anyway, if you think you can get the backend over adodbapi working, that'd be great. I understand your concern about GPL vs. LGPL -- I've written the pymssql author to see if he'll accept my patches on it-- if not, well, I don't want to maintain a "pymssql for django" package, really. There are a few others interested in getting support, too. I'll CC you on that in a moment. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
