On 11/17/05, Simon Willison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HTTP purity is a nice ideal, but until the HTML form model contains
> better support for calling HTTP verbs that reflect what you are
> actually trying to do it just isn't practical in every case. It's
> those edge cases that make GWA's behaviour a bad idea.

To pile on here, another "if only" bit is that if app-level auth was
done through HTTP, then GWA could just not prefetch on any page that
would have required auth headers.  As it is, GWA can't know what
cookie-based auth is doing.

Following that line, I think GWA could be safer by just not
prefetching any request that would pass along HTTP auth or -any-
cookie.  The down-side is obviously less pre-fetching, but it wouldn't
be dangerous.

And if you build a non-safe operation that general robots will trip
over, well, too bad.  ;-)

This still leaves open sites which pass auth info in the URL, though.

Reply via email to