On 11/15/05, panos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know if it is strange or not, but it came to me as a natural > choice for my application. > Think of a logging application where some variables need to be logged > and we need a table for > each variable holding a great number of "timestamp - value" entries.
So why not a table w/ 3 columns: timestamp, type, value? Hot spots?