On 11/15/05, panos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't know if it is strange or not, but it came to me as a natural
> choice for my application.
> Think of a logging application where some variables need to be logged
> and we need a table for
> each variable holding a great number of "timestamp - value" entries.

So why not a table w/ 3 columns: timestamp, type, value?  Hot spots?

Reply via email to