#34699: Filtering on annotated TruncSecond expression gives unexpected result.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Stefan | Owner: Wes P.
Type: | Status: closed
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Documentation | Version: dev
Severity: Normal | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Ready for
| checkin
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Jacob Walls <jacobtylerwalls@…>):
* resolution: => fixed
* status: assigned => closed
Comment:
In [changeset:"8930aafc5a7fbe3931bac858723fcffddb6fb2cb" 8930aafc]:
{{{#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
revision="8930aafc5a7fbe3931bac858723fcffddb6fb2cb"
Fixed #34699 -- Added examples of database comparisons against
Extract()/Trunc().
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/34699#comment:32>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019e8e144944-bfc14591-7409-4b16-b4da-0da841cbddad-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.
