#37049: Changing a m2m through= from one custom model to another is no-op'd 
instead
of raising an error
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Clifford Gama        |                    Owner:  Clifford
                                     |  Gama
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  assigned
    Component:  Migrations           |                  Version:  dev
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  migrations,          |             Triage Stage:
  ManyToManyField, through           |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by Clifford Gama:

Old description:

> Bug in b25aee3b7bef07dd07bed2209efcdf1a8146112c of ticket #22476.
>
> The check to make changes to field options like `blank=True` on m2m's
> with a custom through model no-ops is currently only checking that both
> through models were non-auto-created
> [https://github.com/django/django/blob/1b0d46f715849de53563aaf6912b4ded7d61641d/django/db/backends/base/schema.py#L882-L893
> source], rather than verifying they are the same model. This means any
> two custom through models would satisfy the check and short-circuit.
>
> See regression test in attached PR for how to reproduce.

New description:

 Bug in b25aee3b7bef07dd07bed2209efcdf1a8146112c of ticket #22476.

 The check to make changes to field options like `blank=True` on m2m's with
 a custom through model no-ops is currently only checking that both through
 models were non-auto-created
 
[https://github.com/django/django/blob/1b0d46f715849de53563aaf6912b4ded7d61641d/django/db/backends/base/schema.py#L882-L893
 source], rather than verifying they are the same model. This means any two
 custom through models would satisfy the check and short-circuit.

 See regression test in [https://github.com/django/django/pull/21131 PR]
 for how to reproduce.

--
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/37049#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019da2281069-dc1f89c2-7d61-466a-b41a-08cc02d6a86e-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to