#36862: Clarify RemoteUserMiddleware usage and deployment requirements under 
ASGI
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Natalia Bidart       |                    Owner:  Jacob
         Type:                       |  Walls
  Cleanup/optimization               |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Documentation        |                  Version:  6.0
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  fixed
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Ready for
  RemoteUserMiddleware asgi          |  checkin
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Jacob Walls <jacobtylerwalls@…>):

 * resolution:   => fixed
 * status:  assigned => closed

Comment:

 In [changeset:"2ee757ee502d5663f932dc5c35175c39af4640ce" 2ee757ee]:
 {{{#!CommitTicketReference repository=""
 revision="2ee757ee502d5663f932dc5c35175c39af4640ce"
 Fixed #36862 -- Doc'd the need for a proxy when deploying
 RemoteUserMiddleware under ASGI.

 We have a flood of nuisance security reports describing ASGI deployments
 using RemoteUserMiddleware without a fronting proxy, which is not
 realistic.
 }}}
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/36862#comment:15>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107019d4e590d6d-1f64009f-1268-40ee-82e5-abac5ced0488-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to