#20205: PositiveIntegerfield does not handle empty values well
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  anonymous            |                    Owner:  Jacob
                                     |  Walls
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  closed
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  dev
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Jacob Walls):

 * status:  assigned => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix


Comment:

 Per [https://groups.google.com/g/django-developers/c/GlYM25fdRnA mailing
 list discussion] we cannot envision making behavior changes here because
 we neither want to remove the blankable-and-not-nullable-and-inject-data-
 on-save idiom nor silently cast data in ways a developer might not expect.
 I collected some comments about the blank=True, null=False idiom on #22224
 and will reframe it as a documentation task.

 > That said, this is a way for someone to shoot themselves in the foot,
 and the error message could be cleaner. One possible way forward would be
 for Field.get_prep_value to check if the field has empty_strings_allowed =
 False, and if so and if the value is an empty string, to throw some type
 of error with a more meaningful error message. That said, it's not
 strictly necessary, as someone will likely find this very thread from the
 current error message, and realize what the problem is.

 I think the current error (assuming it's in a similar form today to the
 original `invalid literal for int(): ''`) points out that `''` is not an
 int, so in my opinion, I wouldn't add a particularized exception for folks
 using any single particular poor combination of form and model fields.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20205#comment:25>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/067.2f7e9893c4d2dcb0bca3f5f8ea93a6ac%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to