#32549: Add `Q.empty()` to check for nested empty Q objects like `Q(Q())`
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  jonathan-golorry     |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  closed
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  dev
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:  wontfix
     Keywords:  Q objects, nested,   |             Triage Stage:
  empty                              |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jonathan-golorry):

 We already shortcut logical operations between empty Q objects, so I view
 this more as an extension of that shortcutting (for legibility, not
 performance). I don't think it's fair to say it's backwards incompatible,
 since the simplified Q objects will be logically equivalent to the old
 ones. The expected outcome of Q object combinations is logical
 consistency, not a specific tree structure (as evidenced by `len((Q(x=1,
 y=2) | Q(x=1, y=2)).children == 1)`.

 My original example shows why it's desirable to have `q.empty()` behave
 differently from `not bool(q)`. Empty Q objects are a potential security
 risk, but the standard way to check for them doesn't catch nested empty Q
 objects. #32554 doesn't actually build nested queries, it just uses this
 to avoid bugs with nested query inputs.

 My apologies for reopening without a mailing list consensus, though I feel
 "If there is a way they can improve the ticket to reopen it, let them
 know" indicates that I may reopen if I address the only concern you
 expressed in your closing comment. If the reason for closing is that
 legibility of Q objects isn't it's own concern, I can roll `empty` into
 #32554 without the logic shortcut.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32549#comment:5>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/074.4b3ee5e771602e6fb6f80bf352e89d6f%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to