#31373: Django 3.x / uwsgi is leaking connections
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Marcin Nowak         |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  3.0
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Release blocker      |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Andrew Godwin):

 That would not surprise me - next things to investigate are:

 - Of course, reverting that one change and seeing if it fixes it.
 - Does uwsgi override any part of the threading module? This happens with
 gevent and, I think, mod_wsgi, and it causes havoc as they ruin thread
 IDs.
 - Checking a couple of recent major versions of asgiref within Django's
 compatibility range, to see if the change was there (doubtful)

 Likely cause is that the close_old_connections() task is never being run
 in what Local thinks is the same thread as before. I have a potential
 workaround we can do if it _is_ overriding thread IDs, but if not, we'll
 have to dive deeper and see what we can fix about it.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/31373#comment:15>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.7b0b28c32f418fc4c208eb9241b446d2%40djangoproject.com.

Reply via email to