#29620: Document possible performance benefits from transactions
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: WGH | Owner: nobody
Type: Uncategorized | Status: closed
Component: Documentation | Version: 2.0
Severity: Normal | Resolution: needsinfo
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Changes (by Carlton Gibson):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => needsinfo
Comment:
I'm not sure whether to accept this or not: if the doc-change was good
then, sure, yes, great. Otherwise it may just confuse the matter.
I don't think the advice it wrong for the bulk of common cases.
Are you up for making the patch yourself? If so perhaps you could draft
something up and open a PR so we can assess whether it makes sense?
I'll close this as `needsinfo` pending that. Please re-open as/when you
can expand.
Thanks!
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29620#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/062.d4b64e8161a57b809748654422b06af6%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
