#29522: Serializers are hard to modify
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Levi Cameron         |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Core                 |                  Version:  master
  (Serialization)                    |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by Levi Cameron:

Old description:

> **Use case**
>
> Three times now I've had need to modify the ORM serializers for project
> use. In every case I've had to replicate large parts (if not all) of
> `django.core.serializers.base` in order to change 1 or 2 lines because
> certain calls to functions in `django.core.serializers.base` from the
> serializers are hardcoded.
>
> * Changing JSON serialization to output in alphabetical order (so that
> `dumpdata` doesn't reorder every field each time you run it)
> * Changing deserialization to use `_base_manager` instead of
> `_default_manager` (due to extra constraints on a custom manager)
> * Implementing fixes for #7202, #7350 before they were merged
>
> **Proposal**
> I propose that instead of calling the following functions directly, the
> serializer classes are modified to call an instance method of the same
> name that then calls the existing module-level functions. This would
> allow the ability to more easily override just one aspect of serializer
> functionality without having to replicate large swathes of code.
>
> I am not proposing to move these functions into the python serializer
> class directly because this may break compatibility with existing code
> that depends on the existing functions.
>
> * `django.core.serializers.base.build_instance`
> * `django.core.serializers.base.deserializer_m2m_values`
> * `django.core.serializers.base.deserializer_fk_values`
> * `django.core.serializers.python._get_model` (given that this is already
> an internal function, implementation can be pushed into the class
> directly)
>
> (It might also be nice if the `json` and `pyyaml` classes could also have
> `PythonDeserializer` be made a class attribute but that would involve
> turning the `Deserializer` function into a class and is not nearly as
> much code to override these as the functions above)
>

> If this sounds acceptable, I will submit a patch.

New description:

 **Use case**

 Three times now I've had need to modify the ORM serializers for project
 use. In some cases I've had to replicate large parts (if not most) of
 `django.core.serializers.base` in order to change 1 or 2 lines because
 certain calls to functions in `django.core.serializers.base` from the
 serializers are hardcoded.

 * Changing JSON serialization to output in alphabetical order (so that
 `dumpdata` doesn't reorder every field each time you run it)
 * Changing deserialization to use `_base_manager` instead of
 `_default_manager` (due to extra constraints on a custom manager)
 * Implementing fixes for #7202, #7350 before they were merged

 **Proposal**
 I propose that instead of calling the following functions directly, the
 serializer classes are modified to call an instance method of the same
 name that then calls the existing module-level functions. This would allow
 the ability to more easily override just one aspect of serializer
 functionality without having to replicate large swathes of code.

 I am not proposing to move these functions into the python serializer
 class directly because this may break compatibility with existing code
 that depends on the existing functions.

 * `django.core.serializers.base.build_instance`
 * `django.core.serializers.base.deserializer_m2m_values`
 * `django.core.serializers.base.deserializer_fk_values`
 * `django.core.serializers.python._get_model` (given that this is already
 an internal function, implementation can be pushed into the class
 directly)

 (It might also be nice if the `json` and `pyyaml` classes could also have
 `PythonDeserializer` be made a class attribute but that would involve
 turning the `Deserializer` function into a class and is not nearly as much
 code to override these as the functions above)


 If this sounds acceptable, I will submit a patch.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29522#comment:2>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/063.ecfcc469bd708a1e2584a35e7930f69c%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to