#29513: Improve testing multi_db documentation
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Adam (Chainz) | Owner: nobody
Johnson |
Type: | Status: new
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Testing framework | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Simon Charette):
#28478 is related.
It suggests merging `multi_db` and `allow_database_queries` flags into a
single `databases` aliases set that would be unionized to determine which
databases needs to be created based on the tests retrieved during
discovery.
When a query to an unspecified database would be performed an error
similar to the one raised when performing queries in a `SimpleTestCase`
right now would be raised. `SimpleTestCase.databases` would be an empty
set while `TestCase.databases = {DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS}`. `multi_db = True`
could be alias for `databases = {alias for alias in connections}` during
the deprecation period. We could also support a special `databases =
'__all__'` value to replicate the actual `multi_db` behavior.
Here's the
[https://github.com/django/django/compare/master...charettes:ticket-28478
PoC].
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29513#comment:1>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/068.5be93553cac8f60ad326c49beccc6cbe%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.