#28197: PostgreSQL introspection's get_constraints() retrieves index fields in
arbitrary order
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Mactory              |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug                  |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  1.11
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Release blocker      |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Mactory):

 * needs_tests:  1 => 0


Comment:

 I have extended the existing tests to also test a 4 field index. The test
 fails on my machine without the patch and passes with the patch.
 Since the ordering of the fields was, as far as I could see it, arbitrary,
 it could happen though, that the problem exists but is not detected by the
 test. This can be if the ordering just happens to be correct. I don't see
 any possibility though to catch randomly correct orderings in a test. If
 you know any techniques to do so, please feel free to extend the tests
 further.

 [https://github.com/django/django/pull/8495  PR]

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/28197#comment:4>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.4f71129c1584dea13b78fce932045e6a%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to