#27362: Omitting default_app_config in __init__.py happens too easily.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Thomas Güttler | Owner: nobody
Type: | Status: closed
Cleanup/optimization |
Component: Core (Other) | Version: 1.10
Severity: Normal | Resolution: needsinfo
Keywords: | Triage Stage:
| Unreviewed
Has patch: 0 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Thomas Güttler):
We use this test to unsure that the same error does happen again:
{{{
def test_app_config_registered(self):
for app_config in apps.get_app_configs():
if not app_config.__module__=='django.apps.config':
# This app has an own AppConfig class registered: ok
continue
apps_module_path='%s.apps' % app_config.name
try:
import_module(apps_module_path)
except ImportError:
# No module called "apps": ok
continue
raise AssertionError('%s exists, but the registry
(apps.get_app_configs()) contains the base class. Please use dotted python
path to AppConfig in INSTALLED_APPS or use default_app_config in
__init__.py' %
(apps_module_path))
}}}
I guess this can't be integrated into django.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/27362#comment:6>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.4b3d4cfc7dd16d150054ff07cb0498ff%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
