#26007: SingleObjectTemplateResponseMixin.get_template_names does not return
names
stack properly.
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: chmarr | Owner: chmarr
Type: Bug | Status: assigned
Component: Generic views | Version: 1.9
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 0
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by chmarr):
Note: This patch introduces one potential backwards incompatibility:
In the current code, if both template_name and template_field_name is set,
template_field_name is always ignored. With the patch, if
template_field_name is declared AND there is a non-empty value in the
referenced field, the template name from the field is used in preference
to template_name.
I think the patch implements the intended behaviour (or why bother trying
to `insert(0, name)`), and cases were someone has set both template_name
and template_field_name is rare or non-existant, but given this
possibility, we may want to defer the change to 1.10 with or without
accelerated deprecation. Advise?
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26007#comment:3>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/064.c417e6a76437168f428d95b656047b0f%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
