#25298: Forbid QuerySet filtering by a related field that expects a single value
when multiple values are returned
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  timgraham            |                    Owner:  Y3K
         Type:                       |                   Status:  assigned
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  1.8
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by Naddiseo):

 To re-add my opinion on this from the other issue: I think the ORM should
 be consistent across backends, so it should throw an exception if the
 inner queryset could return more than a single row. My reasoning is
 basically to prevent vendor lock-in; Django was (is?) marketed as being
 mix-and-match for the backends such as database and templating, and Django
 would take care of the rest. (But, I'm fairly biased on this since I just
 spent a few unpleasant weeks converting raw mysql in our code to use ORM
 so that we can eventually switch to postgresql.)

 For the use-case that akaariai brought up, perhaps it would have to be
 changed to accept a limit of one:

 {{{#!python

 Foo.objects.filter(related_model__exact=RelatedModel.objects.values('pk')[:1])

 # SELECT * FROM Foo WHERE related_model_id = (SELECT pk FROM RelatedModel
 LIMIT 1);

 }}}

 This way it's explicit that you only want 0 or 1 returned from the
 subquery. As a side note, does `__exact` allow passing in a model
 instance?
 {{{#!python

 Foo.objects.filter(related_model__exact=RelatedModel.objects.get(pk=1))

 }}}
 Of course, it's not exactly the same since the `.get` can throw a
 `DoesNotExist` exception, and it generates two queries.


 An alternate solution is to implicitly add limits, or change `=` to `IN`
 if the subquery may return multiple results. However, I am against this
 behaviour since - although it may be intuitive - it's implicit and may be
 the result of a programmer error that should really be raised as an error
 instead of silently accepted.

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/25298#comment:8>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/067.dbda77a7fba94aeb5163ddfed7d9d0f1%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to