#24509: Allow Expressions when saving new models
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  AlexHill             |                    Owner:
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  master
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by AlexHill):

 * has_patch:  0 => 1


Old description:

> Opening a ticket after discussion on IRC with Josh.
>
> You can use `Expression` when updating models, but it would also be
> useful to be able to use them when creating models, particularly in order
> to apply database functions to newly-inserted values.
>
> My specific use case for this is a PostgreSQL `TSVectorField`, where
> instead of just inserting a value, I want to insert
> `strip(to_tsvector(<ts_config>, unaccent(<value>)))`. Ideally, I would be
> able to define these all as `Func`s and insert an `Expression`.
>
> I propose to fix this by making `SQLInsertCompiler` check for
> `resolve_expressions` and `as_sql`, as `SQLUpdateCompiler` does.
>
> Alex

New description:

 Opening a ticket after discussion on IRC with Josh.

 You can use `Expression` when updating models, but it would also be useful
 to be able to use them when creating models, particularly in order to
 apply database functions to newly-inserted values.

 My specific use case for this is a PostgreSQL `TSVectorField`, where
 instead of just inserting a value, I want to insert
 `strip(to_tsvector(<ts_config>, unaccent(<value>)))`. Ideally, I would be
 able to define these all as `Func`s and insert an `Expression`.

 I propose to fix this by making `SQLInsertCompiler` check for
 `resolve_expressions` and `as_sql`, as `SQLUpdateCompiler` does.

 Alex

 Update: patch at https://github.com/django/django/pull/5099

--

Comment:

 Here's my patch implementing this:
 https://github.com/django/django/pull/5099

 It also adds support for expressions (and placeholders) in bulk inserts.

 Notes:
  * As Carl suggested, this should allow us to get rid of
 `get_placeholder()` entirely.
  * The handling of `AutoField`s is a bit ugly at the moment. If an
 `AutoField`'s value is `None`, it's removed from the list of fields in
 `Model._save_table()` and then conditionally re-added in
 `SQLInsertCompiler.as_sql()`. I'm thinking about nicer ways to handle
 this.
  * There is a heap of same-but-different code between `SQLInsertCompiler`
 and `SQLUpdateCompiler`, especially now that expressions are supported.
 I'd like to clean this up in a subsequent patch.
  * I've changed the workaround for #10888. I'm pretty sure it won't change
 anything, but I can't test in Oracle.

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24509#comment:7>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.11b16da8f76971606deb5d6d0a023ddb%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to