#17914: reverse() does not support namespaced view references
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Bradley Ayers | Owner: nobody
<bradley.ayers@…> |
Type: Bug | Status: new
Component: Core (URLs) | Version: master
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: | Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: 1 | Needs documentation: 0
Needs tests: 0 | Patch needs improvement: 1
Easy pickings: 0 | UI/UX: 0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by apollo13):
Replying to [comment:15 guettli]:
> For me the view-name is redundant. We try to avoid it. Reversing by
function reference works fine (except this bug). Jumping through the code
with an IDE is much more fun if you use function references.
If I remember correctly we've been over the redundancy point on the ML
already, you can always just write your own url function which sets the
path of the function as name, not really redundant imo. Also reversing by
function reference is something which is ugly in templates etc imo… And
redundant is relative anyways, "app:view_name" is imo way nicer than
"app.views.view_name" -- especially if you have nested imports.
--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/17914#comment:16>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/097.d34b5621e3ac5d48284653199b379473%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
