#24851: Regression in reverse one-to-one field in list_display
---------------------------------+------------------------------------
     Reporter:  jerivas          |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  Bug              |                   Status:  new
    Component:  contrib.admin    |                  Version:  1.8
     Severity:  Release blocker  |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                   |             Triage Stage:  Accepted
    Has patch:  0                |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                |                    UI/UX:  0
---------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by jerivas):

 Whoops, you're right, I was only using `list_display` in 1.6. Sorry about
 that.

 However, wouldn't it be appropriate to support reverse one-to-one
 relations in `fields`? I see three possible scenarios:

 - Reverse one-to-one relations fully supported in `fields`.
 - Supported only when they appear in `readonly_fields`.
 - Unsupported, but they raise a more useful exception and is explained in
 the docs. The current exception says the one-to-one field is unknown to
 the model, which is confusing and gives the impression the user has made a
 typo in `fields`. IMO `ImproperlyConfigured` would be better.

 If you think any of the above have the potential of flying as a feature
 request, I can open a new ticket.

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24851#comment:2>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/065.9c2883e14db87eaa3c9235438e65cda8%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to