#24215: Refactor of lazy model operations
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  AlexHill             |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:                       |                   Status:  new
  Cleanup/optimization               |
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  master
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                       |             Triage Stage:
                                     |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by AlexHill):

 Hey Collin,

 Sorry about the delay, I didn't get an email notification of your comment.
 Thanks for replying.

 I use it this in Mezzanine to
 
[https://github.com/stephenmcd/mezzanine/blob/8e0ff285c9761642cc8544f59b583a75b7821fff/mezzanine/accounts/models.py
 wait on both a user model and a profile model] which are both string
 references. It's more defensive there than strictly necessary but it
 demonstrates the point. I leave more creative uses to future generations.
 :)

 I hear you about `add_lazy_relation` being used outside of Django (I do
 it). If it is used a lot, I see that as a good reason to clean up and
 document the API, though with an extended deprecation timeline. I've done
 a quick search on GitHub but
 
[https://github.com/search?l=python&q=add_lazy_relation&type=Code&utf8=%E2%9C%93
 most of the results are Django builds in other people's repos], so it's
 not all that helpful. Perhaps I should poll django-users to get a sense of
 how widely it's used?

 I propose:
 * Move the core generic functionality into the Apps registry and
 reimplement `add_lazy_relation` accordingly as in this PR.
 * Include `Apps.lazy_model_operation` in the public app registry API and
 document it [https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.7/ref/applications
 /#application-registry here].

 Then either:
 * Scrap the new `lazy_model_operation` helper and don't deprecate
 `add_lazy_relation` at all – simply re-implement it while retaining the
 existing signature, or
 * Proceed as per my plan but push removal of `add_lazy_relation` back to
 the next LTS. Possibly go the whole hog and document
 `lazy_model_operation` as well.

 Now wishing this had come up a bit earlier and snuck into 1.8!

 Cheers,
 Alex

--
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/24215#comment:5>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/066.e496a44b6c59830c848e128d820573a6%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to