I Like the idea of Claude. Asif On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 7:23:22 PM UTC+6, Claude Paroz wrote: > > Le mercredi 22 avril 2020 15:06:12 UTC+2, Adam Johnson a écrit : >> >> I'd like to propose using this new full coverage of operation naming to >> remove the "auto_YYYYMMDD" behaviour, and instead always combine >> operations' "suggested migration names" up until a limit of say 60 >> characters. I made a commit for that here: >> https://github.com/adamchainz/django/commit/c2bc6893a05c2c8099e1fb68e688618446641ed6 >> ... >> Mariusz wrote on the PR: >> >> Personally, I'm against removing auto named migrations. IMO chaining >>> operation names is even more confusing. >>> >> > An alternative could be to ask the user in interactive mode (and keep the > current behaviour in non-interactive mode). > > Claude >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/0bf74280-1620-4954-9629-3fd52d9a8b1e%40googlegroups.com.
