His proposed changes look awesome to me!
IMHO, the biggest issue going async with current implementation was
connection pooling for async code. I feared that we might need huge
numbers of connections in certain scenarios, especially if the code
required altering the connections themselves. The proposed changes look
like they eliminate the issue altogether and I'm not referring to direct
async support alone.
LP,
Jure
On 11/03/2020 09:28, Asif Saif Uddin wrote:
Hi,
As this library is used by django, I thought it would be good to share
with django internals deveopers?
https://www.varrazzo.com/blog/2020/03/06/thinking-psycopg3/
Hope it is useful.
./auvipy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/faea6068-ec43-4da6-9780-1beaedaf0b16%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/faea6068-ec43-4da6-9780-1beaedaf0b16%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django
developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/110c8328-c0ea-e32e-081a-ca42657193b7%40gmail.com.
