Hi Carlton! On Monday, March 18, 2019 at 6:57:01 AM UTC-3, Carlton Gibson wrote: > > Hopefully that distinction is clear enough for here and now. >
Yes, I understand this distinction. Thank you for clarifying. > It's not that all "in" type third-party suggestion would be out of scope — > I could imagine a good proposal for 2FA and One-time-passwords being at > least considered, even if preferred as a third-party app, for example — but > I think yes, "Using Blockchain in Django" is out of scope for us for GSoC. > I understand. >From your perspective, do you think there is some different angle we can look this proposal from? Do you have any suggestion for bringing this proposal into GSoC's scope? Thank you for you attention! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/aa5e97dc-69d8-4f1b-9338-12c11fc607bf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
