On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Artem Malyshev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > It can be huge improvement for asgi_rabbitmq layer. But I'm asking > you to keep this change in the experimental branch before I implement > it for RabbitMQ layer. More questions can came up in progress. > I've actually already implemented it on all of the projects on the master branch last night to see how hard it was (it was not hard at all), but I'll hold off releasing those changes for a bit. > > For me it is still unclear how to implement `channels_capacity` option > for different reply channels in this multiplexing. If all reply > channels for current process will have it's obvious. > Would it be easier if we said that the capacity applied only to the overall process channel, e.g. to "http.response.ABCDEF!", not to the local part as well? I think this makes more sense anyway, and that's how asgi_redis will have ended up after my change. Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAFwN1uqdo7tpxooOJcyu96nYrxSktzdKe_JB%2BrFYZQtHhJ6Pqg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
