Actually I remember you can use field__lt to compare with a datetime object
(e.g. datetime.now()) and validate it.



Best regards,
Ares Ou

*Software Engineer / Full-Stack Python Developer  |  **Phone:* (510) 328 -
5968

*Blog:* http://aresou.net  |  *Github:* https://github.com/aresowj  |  *Stack
Overflow:* http://stackoverflow.com/users/5183727/ares-ou

Ares Ou

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Tim Graham <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the proposal. MaxValueValidator and MaxValueValidator are
> included because they're needed for IntegerField validation. I don't think
> the proposed validators meet the criteria of "needed in 80% of Django
> projects" or "can't easily be implemented as a third-party app".
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-4, Mariano Baragiola wrote:
>>
>> Hello django-developers@,
>>
>> On more than one project, I find myself implementing the same feature over
>> and over again. It's not a rare case scenario, for instance: it's common
>> that invoices have a date that belongs to the past or the present time,
>> but
>> not the future.
>>
>> Seeing that we have django.core.validators.MinValueValidator and
>> django.core.validators.MaxValueValidator, I propose the following:
>>
>> * django.core.validators.DateIsPresent
>> * django.core.validators.DateIsPresentOrPast
>> * django.core.validators.DateIsPresentOrFuture
>> * django.core.validators.DateIsFuture
>>
>> This way, one may easily use them at models.py just like MinValueValidator
>> and MaxValueValidator.
>>
>> The code would be really simple, I have them -differently- implemented at:
>> https://github.com/heimdalerp/heimdalerp/blob/master/common/validators.py
>>
>> Please, let me know if there's already an easier way to do this with
>> current Django, or if this belongs to a custom app instead.
>>
>> If it is ok to add this feature to Django, I can gladly take care of it.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
> msgid/django-developers/62bd473f-19bb-4140-b04f-
> ba733e8b78e5%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/62bd473f-19bb-4140-b04f-ba733e8b78e5%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAFCGC%3DY1tN58Sag0YOUpW_JJOu5LdbN2bWcz2BOpEVBU2Eoewg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • ... 'Mariano Baragiola' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
    • ... Tim Graham
      • ... Ares Ou
      • ... Aymeric Augustin
    • ... Jani Tiainen
      • ... Josh Smeaton

Reply via email to