No they couldn't just change the field length as its already max for that type. They would somehow have to change the type of the field but I don't think that's something we expose. On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 at 19:00, Aymeric Augustin < [email protected]> wrote:
> > On 21 janv. 2016, at 07:24, Josh Smeaton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm in favour of making the change, just call it out as a backwards > compatibility. > > If I understand correctly, Oracle users encountering this issue would just > have to adjust the field length? > > That sounds acceptable. > > -- > Aymeric. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/django-developers/wfp9qNpNpaQ/unsubscribe > . > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/A7B62982-445F-4D56-9966-2E2FBA197888%40polytechnique.org > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAPbDM0eLbddE%2BcRhw6umjJ%3DL01DWv5x1iuXtDhPXudHYCpv6wQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
