also sprach Shai Berger <[email protected]> [2015-12-10 08:38 +1300]: > As far as I can see, you are trying to implement it in the model, > rather than as a new kind of field. Try to write > ExtendedGenericForeignKey, and I think things would look much > better...
Hi, thanks for your response and sorry for taking such a long time to follow-up. I've tried implementing this as a field at the very beginning, but I had an incredibly hard time figuring out which methods I need to provide. I don't suppose you know of any guidelines, other than the GenericForeignKey code (which I've still not fully understood) that could help? -- @martinkrafft | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/ "you don't sew with a fork, so I see no reason to eat with knitting needles." -- miss piggy, on eating chinese food spamtraps: [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/20151230064017.GA21494%40fishbowl.rw.madduck.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
