On Thursday, December 17, 2015, Carl Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Andrew,
> - I share Mark's concern about the performance (latency, specifically) > implications for projects that want to keep deploying old-style, given > all the new serialization that would now be in the request path. I think > some further discussion of this, with real benchmark numbers to refer > to, is a prerequisite to considering Channels as a candidate for Django > 1.10. To take a parallel from Python, Guido has always said that he > won't consider removing the GIL unless it can be done without penalizing > single-threaded code. If you think a different approach makes sense here > (that is, that it's OK to penalize the simple cases in order to > facilitate the less-simple ones), can you explain your reasons for that > position? > We would also need some form of streamed messages for streamed http responses. Is it possible to handle old-style http the way it has always been handled? - Anssi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CALMtK1Gz%3DaYMLyFW2da2C6Wo_-c_V2T_4p6K9eh0vwrKB91dKw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
