On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Tim Graham <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we should keep Trac focused on tracking bugs. The dsf-members > mailing list seems like a natural place to raise these ideas, although > that's a more limited audience, so I'd feel free to raise them here unless > someone else can suggest a better place. > There's a DSF Volunteers list as well that is open to all; however, there's almost no traffic on that list. I agree that Trac should be focussed on tracking bugs. More specifically, it needs to be things that have a defined point of completion. If there's a specific inclusion-related activity that needs to be performed (e.g., the renaming of database replication terms from a while back), that can easily be raised as a bug and closed when it's resolved. More vague targets like "improve inclusivity in the community", while being completely worthwhile activities, don't lend themselves to a ticket tracker. Russ %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAJxq849rvOwaO8M%2BPvzJsyAU4OCU0Cp6HK%3DKKR5Kwef2hGsdtA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
