Hi Anubhav,

It'll be easier to review if you can include ticket numbers with each item 
in the 2.X sections. e.g. "Unpickling Models and QuerySet from incompatible 
version. (#XXXXX)" Ideally, the ticket number would be linked to Trac. Then 
I would repeat these summaries & ticket numbers in each 3.X bullet before 
your analysis. I would also combine the timeline details in section 4 with 
the analysis in section 3. As it is now, it's difficult to review because 
you have to cross reference the two sections. You could include a summary 
in section 4 of just ticket numbers and estimated weeks, but the text like 
"Approach 1:... would be better in section 3 I think.

On Saturday, March 8, 2014 9:47:33 AM UTC-5, anubhav joshi wrote:
>
> Just realized that the proposal name is : Improving error reporting and 
> fixing up related issues. 
> Missed 'reporting' in the thread topic.
>
> Anubhav Joshi
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/714961b0-73e1-4bf7-8ab3-2ac9a482223b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to